IJTEEE
International Journal of Technology Enhancements and Emerging Engineering Research (ISSN 2347-4289)
PREVIOUS PUBLICATIONS



IJTEEE >> Volume 2 - Issue 7, July 2014 Edition



International Journal of Technology Enhancements and Emerging Engineering Research  
International Journal of Technology Enhancements and Emerging Engineering Research

Website: http://www.ijteee.org

ISSN 2347-4289



Community Based Cross-Sectional Study: Preferences Of Placeofdelivery And Birth Attendants Among Women Of Hashemene Town, Oromia Regional State 2012

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Junayde Abdurahmen, Adamu Addissie, Mitike Molla

 

KEYWORDS

Key words: Women Preference, Delivery place, delivery attendants and services utilization Shashemene, Oromia, Ethiopia

 

ABSTRACT

Abstract: Clients’ preference to place of delivery and types of attendants are important factors. Female patients prefer female professionals due to various reasons. Findings show that Women are not using available and accessible maternity services. This is illustrated by low institutional delivery compared to high antenatal care (ANC). Objective: To assess preference of place of delivery, delivery attendants and associated factors among women at Shashemene town. Methods: Cross-sectional study was conducted with mixed approach on a total of 288 women who have child less than one year of age during the survey. Multi stage sampling technique was used. Quantitative Data was entered into EPI info and analyzed using SPSS 16.0 software. Analysis was done using logistic regression. For 6FGDs and 2IDI Topic guides were reviewed manually and electronically, then responses were transcribed and translated later coded into categories and grouped into theme thematically. Result: out of 288 women of reproductive age 95.8% responded to the questionnaires. Only 34.9%, 22.6% and 42.5% of the women attended ANC during their first, second and third trimester respectively. Regarding place of delivery only 37.7 % of women gave birth at home. In multivariate analysis the likelihood of attending and delivering at health facility was high for women whose income 1021-1530/month [OR 4.2, 95%CI: (1.97, 9.32)], education greater or equal to secondary [OR 6.8, 95% CI: (2.9, 15.8)] and positive husband attitude toward health facility [OR 4.8, 95% CI: (1.3, 17.96)]. The chance of giving birth at home was high for those aged between 15-19 years (OR 6.3, 95%CI: (2.7, 14.9). 30% of women explained as they feel comfortable being at home as the most frequent reason for not delivering at health facility followed by to gain family care (29%) and lack of privacy (16.2%). Conclusions: Most women preferred female health professionals, still there are women preferred home as place of deliver. Socio-demographic and cultural factors found to be barriers to preference of services. Policies about maternity health care and education should take into account preferences of women. So, mitigation measure is in need to ensure right and informed choice.

 

REFERENCES

[1]. Block J. Birth war, www.babble.com/pregnancy giving birth/ winning-home birth debate British journal of OBS/GYN; August 3rd, 2009.

[2]. Leslie J, Gupta RG. Utilization of formal services for maternal nutrition and health care. International center for research on women, Washington D.C, Feb. 1989.

[3]. Central statistical agencies demographic health survey 2011. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: 2011.

[4]. Ymam B, Asmaa A. Syrian women’s preferences for birth Attendant and birthplace: BirthdoiA10.1111/ J.0730- 7659.2005.00333x; PMC, May 5, 2006.

[5]. Moke M, Jennifer R, Oona MR. et al.high ANC coverage and low skill attendance in a rural Tanzania district: case for implementing birth plan intervention BMC pregnancy and Childbirth Volume10 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/10/13:2010

[6]. Brehane Y. Women’s reproductive outcomes in rural Ethiopia,: 2000

[7]. Kebede Y. Traditional practices during pregnancy, labor and delivery in Adamitulu woreda. MPH Thesis: presented to school of graduate studies Addis Ababa University; 1997.

[8]. Central statistical agencies demographic health survey2000. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: 2000

[9]. Oromia Regional Health Bureau annual Report of EFY2000. Finfinne, Ethiopia: 2002


[10]. David S. Ronnie Falcao LMMS a home birth midwife in Mountain view CA the gentile Birth.org by Friends of Homebirth: 1990
a. .
[11]. Nancy P, Ubaidur R, and Khan M.E. Men in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan: Reproductive issues (Dhaka: kharsha publishers; 1999).

[12]. Tami R. Evaluation of a traditional birth attendant training programme in Bangladesh Journal home page: www.elsevier.com/midw 2009),doi:10.1016/j.midw: 2009.

[13]. Bachman, et al. District health system; user preference for services in Benin health Policy and Planning, 1997; 6(4):361-370.

[14]. Joseph A. Is a traditional birth attendant good for improving maternal and per natal health? , ross River Nigeria: BMJ2011; 342:d3310.

[15]. Mekonen M. Barriers to utilization maternity care services and user factors1998 Ethiopia. Ethiop J. Health Dev.1997; 17(1)

[16]. Christina R .Titaley et al. Why do some women still prefer traditional birth attendants and home delivery? a qualitative study on delivery care services in West Java Province, Indonesia: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2010; doi: 10.1186/1471- 2393-10-13

[17]. Paul BK, Deborah. Rumsey. Utilization of health facilities and trained birth attendants for Child birth in rural Bangladesh :( an empirical study).Soc. sci.andmed.2002; 54, 1755- 11765.

[18]. Federal Minister of Health. Safe Motherhood Need assessment of Ethiopia: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; 1996.

[19]. World Health Organization. Mother-package: Implementing of the Safe Motherhood in developing countries, Geneva; 1994

[20]. Nigussie M, Haile Mariam D, Mitike G. Assessment of safe delivery service utilization among Women of childbearing age in north Gondar Zone, North West Ethiopia Ethiop.J.Health Dev. 2004; 18(3): 147-152

[21]. Fantahun M. Determinants of antenatal care attendances and preference of site of delivery in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia J. health Dev.1992; 6(2):17-21.

[22]. World Health Organization. Coverage maternal care: A listing of available information, Geneva; 1997.

[23]. MacArthur C. Traditional birth attendant training for improving health behaviours and Pregnancy out comes: RHL commentary (last revised: June 1, 2009).WHO reproductive health Library : Geneva: WHO

[24]. Akala CO. Utilization of maternity services and pregnancy out come in rural Northern Nigeria, East frica Medical journal, 1993; 70(4).

[25]. Dana A, Noreen G, and German R. utilization of care during Pregnancy in rural Guatemala: does Obstetrical need matter? Soc.Sci. and Med.2003; 57:2447-2463

[26]. Mesfin M. and Farrow .J. Determinants of ANC utilization in Aris Zone, Central Ethiopia. EthiopiaJHealthDev.1996 ;( 10):171-18074

[27]. WHO, UNICEF, and UNFPA. Maternal mortality in1996; Estimates developed by WHO and UNICF, Geneva: 2001.11765.

[28]. WHO. Factors influencing prenatal care use among low-income countries report. Geneva: 1990.

[29]. Melkamu F. Assessment of Factors Affecting Utilization of Maternal HealthCare Services in ayssita and Dubti Town, Northeast Ethiopia: 2005.

[30]. Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization (WHO).(2008). Proportion of Births Attended by a Skilled Health Worker 2008 Updates Factsheet. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO

[31]. Mekonen Y. and Mekonen A. Factors influencing the use of maternal health care services in Ethiopia. health popul Nutr, 2003, 21(4):374-384.

[32]. Regassa N. Antenatal and postnatal care service utilization in southern Ethiopia: a population-based study. Afr Health Sci. 2011 September; 11(3): 390–397.